好簡單，當你自稱科學既一刻，就要接受科學既測證。
你一開始講自己係宗教、係民間智慧，同睇相差唔多，fine，你地自便。
但當你自稱係一門科學既時候，科學最大特徵就係可重覆(同一條件測試、十個人應該得出同一結果)、可證偽 (唔係話「無法證實，故此等於必真」，果種唔係科學)。
就算記者存心唔信，只要測試既手法合符科學就得，例如你抱住唔信既心態去煲水，煲水都係一百度果陣會滾。
如果你想幫佢地反駁，好簡單，做多幾次雙盲測試。
記得，唔好搵真動物，因為可能撞中，而且對錯亦死無對證。
既然佢地係從量子去感應，斷估至少100%分辨得到死物啩。
一次錯，ok 我當你失蹄，俾足100張相，混入20張假動物，你只需要講「係咪真動物」就夠，簡單啦啩？
你可以話一次半次一竹竿打一筒人....，咁你地有自信逐個上黎報名囉。我義務幫你收集80張動物相+20張假相又點話。
咩野話，俾到主人安慰就得？咁防輻射鏈嘴、性交轉運(男孩子的話就是肛交轉運了)。
跟我唸一次下面句咒語
大樣本隨機分配安慰劑對照組雙盲實驗
至於咩野叫「全面的報導」，就係俾機會俾當事人發言。
唔通你報曾蔭權貪污案果陣，要訪問埋梁振英and彭定康呀？
Maggie Jordan: How can you be biased towards fairness?
MacKenzie McHale: There aren't two sides to every story. Some stories have five sides some only have one.
Tess Westin: I still don't underst...
Will McAvoy: Bias towards fairness means that if the entire congressional Republican caucus were to walk in to the House and propose a resolution stating that the Earth was flat, the Times would lead with "Democrats and Republicans Can't Agree on Shape of Earth."
我嬲既唔係班神棍，而係你呢種所謂記者。
