好簡單,當你自稱科學既一刻,就要接受科學既測證。
你一開始講自己係宗教、係民間智慧,同睇相差唔多,fine,你地自便。
但當你自稱係一門科學既時候,科學最大特徵就係可重覆(同一條件測試、十個人應該得出同一結果)、可證偽 (唔係話「無法證實,故此等於必真」,果種唔係科學)。
就算記者存心唔信,只要測試既手法合符科學就得,例如你抱住唔信既心態去煲水,煲水都係一百度果陣會滾。
如果你想幫佢地反駁,好簡單,做多幾次雙盲測試。
記得,唔好搵真動物,因為可能撞中,而且對錯亦死無對證。
既然佢地係從量子去感應,斷估至少100%分辨得到死物啩。
一次錯,ok 我當你失蹄,俾足100張相,混入20張假動物,你只需要講「係咪真動物」就夠,簡單啦啩?
你可以話一次半次一竹竿打一筒人....,咁你地有自信逐個上黎報名囉。我義務幫你收集80張動物相+20張假相又點話。
咩野話,俾到主人安慰就得?咁防輻射鏈嘴、性交轉運(男孩子的話就是肛交轉運了)。
跟我唸一次下面句咒語
大樣本隨機分配安慰劑對照組雙盲實驗
至於咩野叫「全面的報導」,就係俾機會俾當事人發言。
唔通你報曾蔭權貪污案果陣,要訪問埋梁振英and彭定康呀?
Maggie Jordan: How can you be biased towards fairness?
MacKenzie McHale: There aren't two sides to every story. Some stories have five sides some only have one.
Tess Westin: I still don't underst...
Will McAvoy: Bias towards fairness means that if the entire congressional Republican caucus were to walk in to the House and propose a resolution stating that the Earth was flat, the Times would lead with "Democrats and Republicans Can't Agree on Shape of Earth."
我嬲既唔係班神棍,而係你呢種所謂記者。
沒有留言 :
張貼留言